Ukraine
Re: Ukraine
Roughly, Abrams had roughly a 13-1 kill ratio against T-72's (older Soviet tanks) in the Gulf War.
Ukraine (lack of training, logistics and battlefield geography) they'd be lucky with a 6-1 kill ratio (that's tank on tank) even against T-90 and possibly T-14 tanks. The Abrams, on the other hand would be mopping the floors with other armored vehicles and ground troops.
Also, expect US will be providing tactical advice on how to best use / defend the Abrams.
Last read, US talking about sending 30 Abrams to Ukraine.
In any case, sending Ukraine Abrams just allows Germany and other allies to send Leopard 2 tanks (at least 100 of them). Win Win in My Book!!!!
Ukraine (lack of training, logistics and battlefield geography) they'd be lucky with a 6-1 kill ratio (that's tank on tank) even against T-90 and possibly T-14 tanks. The Abrams, on the other hand would be mopping the floors with other armored vehicles and ground troops.
Also, expect US will be providing tactical advice on how to best use / defend the Abrams.
Last read, US talking about sending 30 Abrams to Ukraine.
In any case, sending Ukraine Abrams just allows Germany and other allies to send Leopard 2 tanks (at least 100 of them). Win Win in My Book!!!!
- Stantheman
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: February 9, 2009, 3:33 am
Re: Ukraine
The biggest delay in providing any western tanks will be the extensive training in operating and maintaining them.Mosquito wrote: ↑January 25, 2023, 5:24 pmRoughly, Abrams had roughly a 13-1 kill ratio against T-72's (older Soviet tanks) in the Gulf War.
Ukraine (lack of training, logistics and battlefield geography) they'd be lucky with a 6-1 kill ratio (that's tank on tank) even against T-90 and possibly T-14 tanks. The Abrams, on the other hand would be mopping the floors with other armored vehicles and ground troops.
Also, expect US will be providing tactical advice on how to best use / defend the Abrams.
Last read, US talking about sending 30 Abrams to Ukraine.
In any case, sending Ukraine Abrams just allows Germany and other allies to send Leopard 2 tanks (at least 100 of them). Win Win in My Book!!!!
Re: Ukraine
What's another year?Stantheman wrote: ↑January 25, 2023, 6:36 pmThe biggest delay in providing any western tanks will be the extensive training in operating and maintaining them.Mosquito wrote: ↑January 25, 2023, 5:24 pmRoughly, Abrams had roughly a 13-1 kill ratio against T-72's (older Soviet tanks) in the Gulf War.
Ukraine (lack of training, logistics and battlefield geography) they'd be lucky with a 6-1 kill ratio (that's tank on tank) even against T-90 and possibly T-14 tanks. The Abrams, on the other hand would be mopping the floors with other armored vehicles and ground troops.
Also, expect US will be providing tactical advice on how to best use / defend the Abrams.
Last read, US talking about sending 30 Abrams to Ukraine.
In any case, sending Ukraine Abrams just allows Germany and other allies to send Leopard 2 tanks (at least 100 of them). Win Win in My Book!!!!
'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
Re: Ukraine
Leopard 2's could be delivered as early as mid-next month, as tank crew training takes 3-6 weeks.
Abrams training 20-26 weeks to fully train a crew, maybe 10-12 weeks for just the basics. Though doubt US and Ukraine would like the idea of just basic training for tank crews.
Hopefully, Ukraine has enough experienced tank crews available that already have enough knowledge to decrease effective training times.
Expect the main goal was to get Leopard 2's on the battlefield before any possible spring offensive!!!!
Also, pretty sure Ukraine doesn't have armoured recovery vehicles that'll handle an Abrams.
Abrams training 20-26 weeks to fully train a crew, maybe 10-12 weeks for just the basics. Though doubt US and Ukraine would like the idea of just basic training for tank crews.
Hopefully, Ukraine has enough experienced tank crews available that already have enough knowledge to decrease effective training times.
Expect the main goal was to get Leopard 2's on the battlefield before any possible spring offensive!!!!
Also, pretty sure Ukraine doesn't have armoured recovery vehicles that'll handle an Abrams.
Re: Ukraine
The photos of their abandoned tanks speaks less to a lack of Russian recovery vehicles and more to the incompetence of their tank crews.
'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
Re: Ukraine
Plus 4 tanks from Canada.
- Drunk Monkey
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 10149
- Joined: October 14, 2013, 4:39 pm
Re: Ukraine
at this rate will Putin have enough nukes to target all the nations now assisting UKR .. reports of his worsening ill health should be a concern in case he wants to go out with a big bang n take the planet with him.
Im predicting some of his own will remove him dead or alive at some point.
Im predicting some of his own will remove him dead or alive at some point.
Claret n Blue all way thru .. Up the Iron
L2 Season 19/20 Codheads 0 Scunny 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2qrsItFUug
8 minutes is the point of lift off !!!!!!!
L2 Season 19/20 Codheads 0 Scunny 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2qrsItFUug
8 minutes is the point of lift off !!!!!!!
Re: Ukraine
Noted this morning, Ukraine upgrading their tank recovery vehicles to handle Abrams.
Not since early last year have I seen videos of Russians using recovery vehicles to retrieve damaged tanks (most of those videos were just prior to Ukraine blowing them up), they just seem to leave them on the battlefield for Ukraine to recover, use for spare parts or fix (if it's worth the trouble).
Looking forward to seeing how much of a difference Bradley Fighting Vehicles make on the battlefield next month.
Re: Ukraine
Another war.
In 1993, international relations theorist and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer published an article including his prediction that a Ukraine without any nuclear deterrent was likely to be subjected to aggression by Russia, but this was very much a minority view at the time.
Budapest Memorandum:
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzJ1or4F-Ok&t=75s
In 1993, international relations theorist and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer published an article including his prediction that a Ukraine without any nuclear deterrent was likely to be subjected to aggression by Russia, but this was very much a minority view at the time.
Budapest Memorandum:
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzJ1or4F-Ok&t=75s
Last edited by mak on January 28, 2023, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ukraine
mak wrote: ↑January 28, 2023, 4:21 amAnother war.
In 1993, international relations theorist and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer published an article including his prediction that a Ukraine without any nuclear deterrent was likely to be subjected to aggression by Russia, but this was very much a minority view at the time.[8]
Budapest Memorandum:
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzJ1or4F-Ok&t=75s
Yup, and there are still people who think diplomacy and deal making with Russia is the answer.
Do get the feeling Ukraine / West has learned it's lesson (stupidly late......you can't trust Putin's Russia), war will end once Ukraine regains all it's territory per internationally recognized borders......and Russia no longer has the ability or will to threaten Ukraine's sovereignty.
Re: Ukraine
IIRC, Mearsheimer is broadly critical of western policies so maybe his prescient prediction was lost in the larger flow of effluent.mak wrote: ↑January 28, 2023, 4:21 amAnother war.
In 1993, international relations theorist and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer published an article including his prediction that a Ukraine without any nuclear deterrent was likely to be subjected to aggression by Russia, but this was very much a minority view at the time.[8]
Budapest Memorandum:
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzJ1or4F-Ok&t=75s
'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
~Reinhold Messner~
'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~
Re: Ukraine
I hope the Ukrainian tankers are watching this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKZn-vT9CRE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKZn-vT9CRE
Re: Ukraine
There is no stopping now.
At the Pentagon, push to send F-16s to Ukraine picks up steam.
A contingent of military officials is quietly pushing the Pentagon to approve sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmw0nPlkso0
At the Pentagon, push to send F-16s to Ukraine picks up steam.
A contingent of military officials is quietly pushing the Pentagon to approve sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmw0nPlkso0
Re: Ukraine
The hidden battle that stopped russia
https://youtu.be/hh9xT9d6SJU
Interesting guy, William Spaniel. He's produced a number of similar videos
https://youtu.be/hh9xT9d6SJU
Interesting guy, William Spaniel. He's produced a number of similar videos
Re: Ukraine
Very informative video. Thanks for that.
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16906
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Ukraine
Just for the full context, this is what Biden actually said last year:
Re: Ukraine
Sending in equipment does not indicate WW3
Without sending TROOPS it is not WW3.
EXAMPLE would be WW2 and what Roosevelt accomplish before December 1941
https://www.history.com/news/united-sta ... lend-lease
Without sending TROOPS it is not WW3.
EXAMPLE would be WW2 and what Roosevelt accomplish before December 1941
https://www.history.com/news/united-sta ... lend-lease