Yet another school shooting in the US

[pal52]

I am sat with some Thai University Students & asked them to find out the definition of the word Dedious.
Took them approx 2 min.
When I told them Farang could not find the definition even though it was his own language & posted a comment about it being non existent their reply was
HE MUST BE STUPID which is probably correct.
Enough said

I am sat with, that is probably the worst English I have ever heard and you are calling others stupid? That is very funny.

The comment was not about English language but how LS could not find the meaning of the word dedious which was directed at him.

I did not call him a fool the Students said he must be a fool to which I could only agree.

Obviously you do not understand the use of the English language using shortened terms as is normal in this day & age.
I could have said sitting instead of sat.

You are Canadian by your own admission but must be of French Canadian descent so English is not your mother tongue.

You can be excused for not understand the word sat instead of sitting.

Do you understand :5555 but is not part of the English language & used regularly on this Forum
:-" :-"

[pal52]

Just go's to show there are a few smart one's.

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-amer ... 52c8c4394e

Now to get back on topic from other non topic personal comments.

A very brave man to stand up like that & have the courage of his own convictions

[Lone Star]

Sorry I missed your post. Mine will likely do as much good as yours. The rabid democrats don't like facts and truth. They only are able to participate in hatred and lies.

Never be sorry, glalt. But you're correct. FACTS are like kryptonite to LIBs.

It's odd though, and insanely hypocritical when you consider the foolishness that LIBs try to pull off.

LIBs staunchly defend a woman's right to choose and kill a baby in the womb at any time during the pregnancy. They place that right to choose to kill and to follow the 14th Amendment over the life of a baby in the womb. There is very rarely any botched murder of a baby in the womb, and some states even have laws that DEMAND that a survivor of abortion be left to die. About 500,000+ abortions in the US alone.

But when it comes to a citizen's right to choose to arm himself or herself -- without the choice itself taking a life, but more likely to defend that buyer's life and maybe even defend other lives -- LIBs want to deny us that choice AND that right.

Consider the stand LIBs take against the death penalty. They will fight tooth and nail to keep a GUILTY person from being put to death -- by the law of that particular state, but they'll allow an INNOCENT baby to be slaughtered in its mother's womb.

LIBs live in a Swamp of Hypocrisy.

[stattointhailand]

Footy Programme on ESPN today, were discussing the fact that Khun Aguero was seen pushing a fan who had invaded the pitch after the Wigan v Man City match last night. Two of the pundits, Shaka Hislop and Craig Burley (both ex top flight players in UK and now working in US media) were talking about the fact that the Wigan security should have kept the fans off the pitch etc etc etc, then Alejandro Merano who spent his career in US says that Aguero was perfectly within his rights to defend himself (everyone agreed that his push was indeed waranted) ....... because the guy may have had something in his pocket
The look on Italian journo Gabriele Marcotti's face was a picture, Burley tried to cover by saying well sometime in the future someone may be "well oiled" .........
Marcotti's comment was a classic ........ if you are so worried, do you push everyone away that gets near you in the shopping mall?

Made me see that even though none of the people on the show (or me and I'm sure most of the viewers outside US) even thought about the guy being armed, the culture of US made the guy who spent all his time there immediately think of a worse case scenario. I suppose If I spent my life scared of my own shadow, I too would want to be "tooled up" for all possibilities.

[fatbob]

Sorry I missed your post. Mine will likely do as much good as yours. The rabid democrats don't like facts and truth. They only are able to participate in hatred and lies.

Never be sorry, glalt. But you're correct. FACTS are like kryptonite to LIBs.

It's odd though, and insanely hypocritical when you consider the foolishness that LIBs try to pull off.

LIBs staunchly defend a woman's right to choose and kill a baby in the womb at any time during the pregnancy. They place that right to choose to kill and to follow the 14th Amendment over the life of a baby in the womb. There is very rarely any botched murder of a baby in the womb, and some states even have laws that DEMAND that a survivor of abortion be left to die. About 500,000+ abortions in the US alone.

But when it comes to a citizen's right to choose to arm himself or herself -- without the choice itself taking a life, but more likely to defend that buyer's life and maybe even defend other lives -- LIBs want to deny us that choice AND that right.

Consider the stand LIBs take against the death penalty. They will fight tooth and nail to keep a GUILTY person from being put to death -- by the law of that particular state, but they'll allow an INNOCENT baby to be slaughtered in its mother's womb.

LIBs live in a Swamp of Hypocrisy.

You never stop, un bloody believable, guns are now being compared to abortion, get a life man !!! Pathetic to say the least. Not even John Cleese could think that one up....

[skinner]

Sorry I missed your post. Mine will likely do as much good as yours. The rabid democrats don't like facts and truth. They only are able to participate in hatred and lies.

Never be sorry, glalt. But you're correct. FACTS are like kryptonite to LIBs.

It's odd though, and insanely hypocritical when you consider the foolishness that LIBs try to pull off.

LIBs staunchly defend a woman's right to choose and kill a baby in the womb at any time during the pregnancy. They place that right to choose to kill and to follow the 14th Amendment over the life of a baby in the womb. There is very rarely any botched murder of a baby in the womb, and some states even have laws that DEMAND that a survivor of abortion be left to die. About 500,000+ abortions in the US alone.

But when it comes to a citizen's right to choose to arm himself or herself -- without the choice itself taking a life, but more likely to defend that buyer's life and maybe even defend other lives -- LIBs want to deny us that choice AND that right.

Consider the stand LIBs take against the death penalty. They will fight tooth and nail to keep a GUILTY person from being put to death -- by the law of that particular state, but they'll allow an INNOCENT baby to be slaughtered in its mother's womb.

LIBs live in a Swamp of Hypocrisy.

You never stop, un bloody believable, guns are now being compared to abortion, get a life man !!! Pathetic to say the least. Not even John Cleese could think that one up....

You are spot on Fatbob . This guy is a nutter. The avatar says it all.

[Lone Star]

It's odd though, and insanely hypocritical when you consider the foolishness that LIBs try to pull off.

LIBs staunchly defend a woman's right to choose and kill a baby in the womb at any time during the pregnancy. They place that right to choose to kill and to follow the 14th Amendment over the life of a baby in the womb. There is very rarely any botched murder of a baby in the womb, and some states even have laws that DEMAND that a survivor of abortion be left to die. About 500,000+ abortions in the US alone.

But when it comes to a citizen's right to choose to arm himself or herself -- without the choice itself taking a life, but more likely to defend that buyer's life and maybe even defend other lives -- LIBs want to deny us that choice AND that right.

Consider the stand LIBs take against the death penalty. They will fight tooth and nail to keep a GUILTY person from being put to death -- by the law of that particular state, but they'll allow an INNOCENT baby to be slaughtered in its mother's womb.

LIBs live in a Swamp of Hypocrisy.

=====

You never stop, un bloody believable, guns are now being compared to abortion, get a life man !!! Pathetic to say the least. Not even John Cleese could think that one up....

=====
Actually, you never stop -- being immature.

As with most of your posts in threads where I am posting, you seem more intent on trying to find an attack angle on me rather than using some reading comprehension and actually using reasoning skills and looking at what is posted.

I am not comparing abortion with the death penalty or with gun ownership.

I'll lay it out quickly and easily for you and all of your cult following of name-callers:

I'm comparing the SELECTIVE views of LIBs and LIFE. They care about LIFE when it can help them get rid of guns for law-abiding citizens, but they don't care about LIFE when it comes to abortion. They care about LIFE when it comes to a guilty person being sentenced to death, but they don't care about the innocent LIFE in the womb.

If someone is going to claim to be concerned about LIFE, I think 500,000+ murders of innocents in the womb is pretty significant.

And here's something for you to chew on:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/27339/de ... frank-camp

Dem Sen. Kamala Harris Says ‘We Cannot Tolerate A Society’ In Which ‘Our Babies Are Being Slaughtered’

Of course, she's not talking about babies being slaughtered in the womb. The Democrat Party would abandon her.

NOTE: If you find anything out there that tells me how Democrats propose to confiscate over 200 million firearms that are already out there and how they plan to keep guns from falling into the hands of criminals, let me know. The plan is always to prevent law-abiding citizens from purchasing guns. By the way, the law-abiding citizens are the "Good Guys".

Good night. I'll check back later and see if your cult following increases.

[stattointhailand]

So let me get this right, It's not ok to destroy a few cells that have not even taken on the form of a human being, let alone breathed or thought for itself, but it is perfectly alright to kill someone who HAS been born , and grown up, because he/she accidentally got in the way of someones deliberately fired bullet providing the gun was bought and owned by previously law abiding citizens. Just wanted to clear that one up as it appears according to you, that everyone's political views must depend on this and I wanted to know if I was a LIB ? or not

[Doodoo]

"it is a risk to openly display them -- even in the home. It makes that home a target."

But hold on you said that if people have guns they MUST publicize it so those Bad Men will not come and murder my family in the middle of the night!!!

Also on another angle I don't see many other Americans on this one defending this at all!! You mean to say there are only maybe one or two Americans living in Thailand (why I don't know since they don't have rights as they don't have a gun for every person in the Nation)

You certainly must feel naked not having the right to own a gun and protect one self from the evil doers at hand

Or is it with the lack of gun ownership one feels much better in the surroundings here in Thailand??

Guns about 15.6 guns per 100 residents (Thailand) as compared to the USA 101 guns per 100 residents

I aint going to talk car deaths, abortions, killed by a hippo etc GUNS

Find someone else to take up your cause

[Lone Star]

…

You don't get it either. It's not my view. I'm not cherry picking the Constitution. I accept it in full.

Ask LIBs why they're hypocrites when it comes to LIFE. Ask LIBs why they selectively revere only certain rights in the Constitution.

A citizen is killed by an illegal alien, and it's the same hypocrisy. LIBs want to protect the rights of the illegal. No mention of guns then. That will hurt their open borders mission.

[Lone Star]

You certainly must feel naked not having the right to own a gun and protect one self from the evil doers at hand

Or is it with the lack of gun ownership one feels much better in the surroundings here in Thailand??

You don't have any idea what you're talking about with respect to my gun ownership. Foreigners may own a firearm if going through the proper channels.

Read up.

[Lone Star]

But hold on you said that if people have guns they MUST publicize it so those Bad Men will not come and murder my family in the middle of the night!!!

Also on another angle I don't see many other Americans on this one defending this at all!!

Please quote me accurately. I never said that. 555 Provide my quote. You can at least do that.

What is there to defend? I've provided factual information and sources, and no one has provided anything other than personal opinions and name-calling. 555

[tinpeeba]

In Chicago, they have some of the most stringent gun laws in the entire US and one of the highest per capita murder rates for cities.

Fact Check: Is Chicago Proof That Gun Laws Don't Work?
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/55558059 ... don-t-work

Sorry, gun lovers, your attempts to use Chicago as a prop to bolster your claims that gun control laws do nothing to curb gun violence just don’t hold up, says Tribune columnist Dahleen Glanton:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/colu ... story.html

[fatbob]

Lonestar you do not provide factual information on any of your crusades, you provide an OPINION from others that you happen to support, understand, an opinion not fact, I hope that is clear to you.

Gun ownership in Thailand. A foreigner CANNOT own a firearm in Thailand, a foreigners wife can, maybe a deviat like yourself has searched the law for a loophole, I am very happy and content to accept the fact that I cannot own a firearm in this country. http://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/art ... earms-law/ Read the third paragraph. Now if your wife owns firearms then you should be very careful as you might get caught with one of your third gender friends and have a weapon used on you, I wonder if on the receiving end your view on gun laws would change?

Were any of your family, father, grandfathers, uncles or brothers members of the KKK?

[vlad]

Fat Bob and other members why do you give LS Ammunition to use against you on this thread ?? your never going to convince him on his views on the right to bear arms so why bother posting on it he will just use the old excuses like its our right its in the amendment its the governors votes stopping this stopping that you wont win he will never accept its his country with the worlds worst gun murders so just simply dont post anymore the thread will slip down then be forgotten.

[fatbob]

vlad, you are dead right but I find his arrogance amusing and get a grin out of it, believe me I don't take anything he say's seriously.

For those that don't know he used to go under the alias of WB Alum, until the previous owner of Udon Map banned him.

By the same token extremists, whether they are Moslem, right wing fanatics, religous fanatics or left fanatics, they have absolutely nothing to contribute to the betterment of society, LS would have to be one of the most extreme arrogant right wing and possibly religious fanatics there is, how in the hell he is permitted to have an arsenal of weapons in the US and now as he has pointed out possibly in Thailand, that is a worry...

[Giggle]

Imagine if your government said you're not to be trusted to protect yourself. That's a bigger worry.

[fatbob]

Imagine if your government said you're not to be trusted to protect yourself. That's a bigger worry.

That is the job of the Police, unless you believe in vigilantes and anarchy...

[stattointhailand]

Don't worry Billy were just taking the p*ss ........ I for one have loads of American relatives, some for and some against guns, I find it quite funny that they post on face book that they are praying every night for someone who has a cold, but would quite happily forget their religious teachings when it came to gunning someone down

[glalt]

In Chicago, they have some of the most stringent gun laws in the entire US and one of the highest per capita murder rates for cities.

Fact Check: Is Chicago Proof That Gun Laws Don't Work?
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/55558059 ... don-t-work

Sorry, gun lovers, your attempts to use Chicago as a prop to bolster your claims that gun control laws do nothing to curb gun violence just don’t hold up, says Tribune columnist Dahleen Glanton:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/colu ... story.html

What I find interesting and enlightening is that the top city murder capitals are controlled by democrats and have been for many years. How do you explain that? They want more gun laws but then tie a cop's one arm behind his back to protect the gang punks, illegals and other scum bags. You can't have it both ways and expect to make a difference. Check the definition of insanity.