Having had info which I am not at liberty to divulge, it would appear that contary to my thoughts the Embassy has acted and their actions befit the situation.
For anyone who wishes to know more may I suggest a PM to either trubrit or myself, as information would not be best publicised.
I am not saying that you will be given any information but anything we wish to say or not as the case maybe will be more private.
In accordance with judicial protocol and all that legal stuff some of us understand others do not, any further chit chat about the whys and wherefores would be counterproductive and I ask all of you to be
a Circumspect
b, refrain from chatting on line about this occurrence
c, stop atacking people who in their own eway are trying to help an unfortunate person who has fallen foul of the Thai judicial system
Thanks
ALL TO NOTE PLEASE..............many thanks to you all for understanding.
Englishman accused of killing Thai wife.
-
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 495
- Joined: March 24, 2008, 9:34 am
Re: Englishman accused of killing Thai wife.
Yes let's stop attacking people who in their own way are trying to help
Text edited by Mods.
Thread locked.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Text edited by Mods.
Thread locked.
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 17078
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Englishman accused of killing Thai wife.
Most of us on this forum have suggested at various times that they would like to see Thailand adopt many western standards, whether it be for driving, visas, property rights, consumer protection, noise and other pollution etc, etc, etc.
If we are to be consistent, the western rules on sub-judice would be a case in point. Given that this matter now appears to be before the courts (or very close to being so), can I suggest the mods lock this thread to shut down the wild (and probably ill-informed) speculation that is going on. =D>
If we are to be consistent, the western rules on sub-judice would be a case in point. Given that this matter now appears to be before the courts (or very close to being so), can I suggest the mods lock this thread to shut down the wild (and probably ill-informed) speculation that is going on. =D>