westerby wrote:seymourbutts wrote:So now westers shes not innocent but we should wait till her case is heard!!!! a shift of position, it was she is innocent until a fair trial only a day or so ago!!!!
Sorry, I can't find where I said she was innocent, can you point that post out for me? I think you'll find I never said anything of the sort.
My position remains the same:
1. We don't know the details of the case so we can't assume anything.
2. The Lao justice system must be played out to determine the outcome.
3. You and the other Grannies haven't a clue what you're on about.
I suggest you need to check your facts before you post your warped opinions on this thread then you won't look like an ar$e.
Sorry westers you are right about the innocent bit, i was wrong , you know lumping you in with all her other supporters on here!!!!
I would like to point out some errors though:
1. We do know the details of the case and she is guilty of the charges under Laos law... To say we dont know the details, apart from being childish is like saying the press have never and will never report any case throughout history!! Unless you personally are in court in any case ever, you dont know the details... so we rely on people such as the bbc to find the details and report them to us!!! Everybody here who doesnt support her see that you supporters are losing the argument and shes just not going to get justice!!! So clutching at straws isnt going to work!!
2. resorting to calling us grannies and saying we dont have a clue sounds like my ex wife when she was losing the argument!! And is more than childish!!!
3. I dont think my opinions are warped (again being childish) i just think they are different to yours and all the other people who are in denial here.. And it hurts you because someone doesnt agree with your views (again childish)
You could of course define how people with the attitude that she should get justice Laos style like me and others are grannies, last time i looked i was male and not so childish!!!! And again you could qualify how I and others have warped opinions, again childish remarks from a person fast losing the argument...
I wonder if you and others will be at Heathrow to welcome her home? The poor thing!!!!
So to recap, my opinion here is: She is guilty as reported by the bbc and other press, she had the stuff strapped to her again as reported. (there is no other way for anyone to say any different) Under Laos law she is guilty. End of!!
This makes her a heroin trafficker, to me she is scum, an absolute low life of society. People who defend this i cannot understand!!!
I believe she should get Laos justice 100% and be executed after now giving birth...
However, I've had protracted arguments with the older generation before and their last refuge is always that I should grow up and stop being childish, that normally means they have no effective argument to counter mine.
- and that is my opinion.