All I can say isCome on TC, reveal all, what can I drink to give ME these illusions of grandeur. Apart from the cigar I was positively drooling
Your Longevity
looks like you all are stuck with me for about 30 more yrs, but i did lie on drinking question, but i deducted the amount to be honest here, lost 6 yrs for getting drunk twice a month as opposed to gaining a yr for drinking 2 drinks a day, i guess they assume all month drunks drive drunk and die. 86 - 6 = 80, which would be nice, although i was hope to tie Val at 100. actually fairly accurate, as my parents made it to 69 and 74, both heavy drinkers and smokers, which i fairly avoid except our month therapy session and usually one other non forum therapy session. maybe i should change my pension plan, as if i live past 73, i lose money by taking it early at 55 instead of 65.
Beer Monkey wrote
and I do inhale
regards
TC
One thing I do have is a beautiful cherry wood humidor
www.jjfox.ie i do love a lardy-dar. so i am surprised i got the big 4-0
and I do inhale
regards
TC
- beer monkey
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 14553
- Joined: January 1, 2006, 8:08 am
- Contact:
- beer monkey
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 14553
- Joined: January 1, 2006, 8:08 am
- Contact:
Beer Monkey wrote
My favourite being my chicken liver pate layered with crushed Pistachios topped with black peppers with a few other secret ingredients and of course a large splash of Remy thrown in naturalment.
As for the longevity test....well I put my age in and before I got to the last question I am already back to my age....so I guess Ishould have been dead years ago.
Just goes to show...dont believe anything on the internet
TC
Insurance companies nightnmare
Funny you should mention pate. I will admit I am not the best chef in our little group (most probably the worst being half English) but I am noted for my variety of pate'sTC, i don't suppose you have a fine bit of pate with the gourmet meals
My favourite being my chicken liver pate layered with crushed Pistachios topped with black peppers with a few other secret ingredients and of course a large splash of Remy thrown in naturalment.
As for the longevity test....well I put my age in and before I got to the last question I am already back to my age....so I guess Ishould have been dead years ago.
Just goes to show...dont believe anything on the internet
TC
Insurance companies nightnmare
- beer monkey
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 14553
- Joined: January 1, 2006, 8:08 am
- Contact:
Longevity
Ohmigod, TC, that pate sounds amazing (sinful, decadent, delicious, et cetera, et cetera). Black pepper is my favorite.
Have you noticed that the longer we talk about "Longevity," the more ideas we give each other on how to shorten it.
SHARA
Have you noticed that the longer we talk about "Longevity," the more ideas we give each other on how to shorten it.
SHARA
- beer monkey
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 14553
- Joined: January 1, 2006, 8:08 am
- Contact:
something i read today that might interest fine whisky drinkers, A scotch whisky which is 92 per cent alcohol is to be made by Bruichladdich distillery on the island of Islay.
They will use a 300 year old recipe in which the single malt is distilled 4 times instead of the usual 2.
They will produce 5000 bottles.
will that add a few years or take some off i wonder.
They will use a 300 year old recipe in which the single malt is distilled 4 times instead of the usual 2.
They will produce 5000 bottles.
will that add a few years or take some off i wonder.
Can You Dig It Dug.?
Dunno bout that last bit, but I bet it plays havoc with my bank balance if it ever gets to Thailand.BEER MONKEY wrote:something i read today that might interest fine whisky drinkers, A scotch whisky which is 92 per cent alcohol is to be made by Bruichladdich distillery on the island of Islay.
They will use a 300 year old recipe in which the single malt is distilled 4 times instead of the usual 2.
They will produce 5000 bottles.
will that add a few years or take some off i wonder.
ps For lovers of single malt. Big C are now keeping on the shelf The Glenlivet. Not the best but beggars can't be choosers
New Assessment
Here's another test for you good folks! Part of the introduction that I saw describing it went like this:
"The test was developed by researchers in San Francisco, and their results were published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). It's a simple, 12-point questionnaire. To develop the test, the researchers collected data from nearly 12,000 people over the age of 50, and then followed the participants for four years.
"The test is supposed to be 81% accurate, but there's no crystal ball involved. To score high (indicating increased risk of mortality), you are exhibiting poor health to begin with. So don't expect a big surprise. But if you're out of shape, it might be a good wake-up call."
Now, with that goundwork, I'll prepare you by telling you that one of the 12 questions asked was for you categorize your BMI as either being below a numeric level, or else above it--just the two choices. And there was an explanation included describing how to estimate your BMI. It necessitated mastering this equation: (BMI equals your weight in pounds divided by your height in inches squared, multiplied by 703.)
Well, that one had me! I had to quit the quiz and hunt up an easier explanation of how to calculate my BMI--I'm afraid my formal school days ended just about 40 years ago! So if the above formula is a little troublesme for you, too, then use this calculator (you can select English or metric) and have your BM figure ready to supply:
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm
Okay, here's the darn test--click the link at tne end of the second paragraph of this article:
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/02/1 ... y.test.ap/
In conclusion, although my original test resulted in a disappointing outcome for me, I'm happy to report that there is less than a 4% chance of my knocking off in the next four years--at least, according to this test!
"The test was developed by researchers in San Francisco, and their results were published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). It's a simple, 12-point questionnaire. To develop the test, the researchers collected data from nearly 12,000 people over the age of 50, and then followed the participants for four years.
"The test is supposed to be 81% accurate, but there's no crystal ball involved. To score high (indicating increased risk of mortality), you are exhibiting poor health to begin with. So don't expect a big surprise. But if you're out of shape, it might be a good wake-up call."
Now, with that goundwork, I'll prepare you by telling you that one of the 12 questions asked was for you categorize your BMI as either being below a numeric level, or else above it--just the two choices. And there was an explanation included describing how to estimate your BMI. It necessitated mastering this equation: (BMI equals your weight in pounds divided by your height in inches squared, multiplied by 703.)
Well, that one had me! I had to quit the quiz and hunt up an easier explanation of how to calculate my BMI--I'm afraid my formal school days ended just about 40 years ago! So if the above formula is a little troublesme for you, too, then use this calculator (you can select English or metric) and have your BM figure ready to supply:
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm
Okay, here's the darn test--click the link at tne end of the second paragraph of this article:
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/02/1 ... y.test.ap/
In conclusion, although my original test resulted in a disappointing outcome for me, I'm happy to report that there is less than a 4% chance of my knocking off in the next four years--at least, according to this test!
Garnet & Jack