data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04044/0404431edd424183d35b839edcd247231ab371d6" alt="Confused :?"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100118/ts ... Rlc2dldHJl
My point exactly!MALC wrote:get back to basics. if somone hits you . you hit them back fxxxx the rule of law
Maritime law gives all countries free access to the open seas. But, doesn't it also give the owners of ships the right to protect their crews, their ships and cargo? And that is what we are talking about.jackspratt wrote:Let's just forget about established international maritime law, which allows free access on the seas to vessels of all countries, under very clearly laid down conventions.
In excess of 150 posts on this subject (across 3 threads), and not one "defender" yet that I have seen.Texpat wrote: Of course the libtards of the world will scream out that they're merely "innocent civilians," just trying to make a living. I suspect there's a few posters on UM that might defend them. Pay no attention to that idiocy.
Offenders are given plenty of opportunity to reconsider what they're about to undertake. If they chose not to heed the advice and continue on anyway, well, we can't all live forever, can we?rick wrote:blow the F*ckers out of the water if they get close tactic is what US soldiers did in Iraq with cars driven by the locals. They made a lot of friends that way.