You really cant tell can you? (Wife leaves me)

Post by **merchant seaman** » October 28, 2011, 7:21 pm

To air ones dirty laundry in public is beyond me why someone wants to do this. No spouse abuse?? Maybe not physical but verbal spouse abuse is at times worse, and this guy is definitlly cabable of that and verbal abuse will be passed onto the children. I'm sure the court in Oz will render the right verdict. And I think most of us know what that will be. By the why you can verbally abuse me as much as you want, I acutally enjoy it. And after you get rid of your present wife legally you will most likely come back here and do it all over again.

Post by **BenZona** » October 28, 2011, 8:20 pm

merchant seaman wrote:To air ones dirty laundry in public is beyond me why someone wants to do this. No spouse abuse?? Maybe not physical but verbal spouse abuse is at times worse, and this guy is definitlly cabable of that and verbal abuse will be passed onto the children. I'm sure the court in Oz will render the right verdict. And I think most of us know what that will be. By the why you can verbally abuse me as much as you want, I acutally enjoy it. And after you get rid of your present wife legally you will most likely come back here and do it all over again.

hahahaha comedy gold direct from the book of hackneyed cliches

Post by **Barstool** » October 28, 2011, 8:28 pm

Right BenZona; so that's the first line of your previous post out of the window!!
Written proof that the only reason for this whole thread is to antogonise other people with happy and content lives,
Hysterical

Post by **BenZona** » October 28, 2011, 8:30 pm

I only did this

BenZona wrote:hahahaha comedy gold direct from the book of hackneyed cliches

to get this reaction

Barstool wrote:Right BenZona; so that's the first line of your previous post out of the window!!

(giggle) from someone like you

like i said, easily manipulated..... in the time it takes to skin up a bifta or less

Post by **old-timer** » October 29, 2011, 2:38 am

BenZona wrote: the time it takes to skin up a bifta

OT was unsure what a "bifta" was. So via google I found out it was a marajuana roll. Drugs.

So now we have an OP junkie.

OT was quite pleased that another months well overpaid salary is going into his bank account this weekend so I can spoil the wife and kids, a few WFB's and myself. Not particularly in that order. I didn't even get a parking ticket this month.

OT......... $\:D/$

Post by **Frankie 1** » October 29, 2011, 4:50 am

BenZona wrote:I hear what you are saying, but they are just so easy to manipulate.

Troll

BenZona wrote:(Comment removed by moderator)

...again

BenZona wrote:like i said, easily manipulated.....

Troll

Post by **nkstan** » October 29, 2011, 6:18 am

Frankie 1 wrote:
BenZona wrote:I hear what you are saying, but they are just so easy to manipulate.
Troll

BenZona wrote:(Comment removed by moderator)
...again

BenZona wrote:like i said, easily manipulated.....
Troll

I don't think so,but if you do,WHY ARE YOU FEEDING HIM?Like to see yourself in print?

Post by **BenZona** » October 29, 2011, 6:27 am

old-timer wrote:
BenZona wrote: the time it takes to skin up a bifta
OT was unsure what a "bifta" was. So via google I found out it was a marajuana roll. Drugs.

So now we have an OP junkie.

OT......... $\:D/$

hahaha, fancy having to look that up, that's almost quaintly cute.... sort of like having a record player and a collection of early 78's in you're "things i take to a desert island".... so 19th century...

I bet you drink more alcohol than i put ANYTHING into my body, i dont even drink that.....Anyway, moving away from the octogenarians......

I think my ex sank to a new low yesterday. At this place i am seeing my son, i enquired about if my daughter could come and see him too, they said there would be no problems with that at all but, they also had to ask her.....

when she arrived to collect him, they went and asks her, and she hand wrote a letter saying that my daughter could only see her brother ONCE A MONTH and then gave no reason...

suffice to say her handwritten letter in perfect English is now safely annexured but, in all seriousness, what kind of disgusting person would treat a kid like that, she has no reason whatsoever to deny my daughter a visit to her brother, and in fact both of them (the two kids) have a right to know eachother

This shows just how low this thing is prepared to stoop. I suppose thats my fault as well yes? I guess i should just agree and let her carry on.

:-&

Post by **Bandung_Dero** » October 29, 2011, 8:03 am

BenZona wrote: when she arrived to collect him, they went and asks her, and she hand wrote a letter saying that my daughter could only see her brother ONCE A MONTH and then gave no reason...

Now I'm really confused, are you saying your ex has the siblings housed in different locations?

Post by **bamakmak** » October 29, 2011, 8:14 am

BenZona - I'm a bit confused. Earlier this week, you said that at the court hearing concerning the DVO, you won hands down and the your wife dropped all charges.

Now, you just post the following:

BenZona wrote:I think my ex sank to a new low yesterday. At this place i am seeing my son, i enquired about if my daughter could come and see him too, they said there would be no problems with that at all but, they also had to ask her.....when she arrived to collect him, they went and asks her, and she hand wrote a letter saying that my daughter could only see her brother ONCE A MONTH and then gave no reason...

So, it's obvious that you continue to be under court-ordered supervised visits with your son. In a normal situation involving child visitation, no supervision is required.

Care to explain?

Post by **Bandung_Dero** » October 29, 2011, 8:18 am

Sorry got it! Page 6, the daughter is the OP's not the ex's.

Post by **BenZona** » October 29, 2011, 11:23 am

bamakmak wrote:BenZona - I'm a bit confused. Earlier this week, you said that at the court hearing concerning the DVO, you won hands down and the your wife dropped all charges.

So, it's obvious that you continue to be under court-ordered supervised visits with your son. In a normal situation involving child visitation, no supervision is required.

Care to explain?

I would have thought it was quite obvious. Contact places are quite common now for visits involving young children where family violence is ALLEGED (note that word). and thats what there were... allegations now, there are"

1:Two separate court proceedings
2:One was dropped on Tuesday
3:The other one is still ongoing
4:The Court dates in two separate cases do not run one after the other

Unfortunately you cannot rush down to a second court and expect to get a court appearance at short notice. It took me almost two months to get an "emergency" date, well, the date given was two months later. it also takes time for transcripts etc to be made.

I have to be patient, and in the meantime i am more than happy to be observed with my Son. nothing bad can come of that

and at least we are seeing each other. These things take time....

Post by **merchant seaman** » October 29, 2011, 11:44 am

And hopefully you are now providing financial assistance. Or are you?

Post by **bamakmak** » October 29, 2011, 11:46 am

BenZona wrote:I would have thought it was quite obvious.

No, not obvious at all. I'm not sure that you mentioned anywhere previously that there were TWO separate allegations of domestic violence. Perhaps I missed it. You certainly implied that any legal issues concerning domestic violence had been dropped.

Post by **BenZona** » October 29, 2011, 11:59 am

bamakmak wrote:
BenZona wrote:I would have thought it was quite obvious.
No, not obvious at all. I'm not sure that you mentioned anywhere previously that there were TWO separate allegations of domestic violence. Perhaps I missed it. You certainly implied that any legal issues concerning domestic violence had been dropped.

and they have... think about it... Ill help you again
1: DV case
2: child case
3: same allegations
3: separate dates
4: waiting

hope that helps

Post by **bamakmak** » October 29, 2011, 12:18 pm

Sorry if I’m having difficulty in understanding why, when all legal issues concerning domestic violence have been dropped, you’re still not allowed to see you child unsupervised. Unlike yourself, I’ve never been accused of abusing a woman or a child and I’m not well versed in all the legal technicalities as you seem to be.

Post by **BenZona** » October 29, 2011, 1:16 pm

bamakmak wrote:Sorry if I’m having difficulty in understanding why, when all legal issues concerning domestic violence have been dropped, you’re still not allowed to see you child unsupervised. Unlike yourself, I’ve never been accused of abusing a woman or a child and I’m not well versed in all the legal technicalities as you seem to be.

Sarcastic dig noted... and discarded... in life knowledge of all things leads to a better life. I know about many things i have not experienced. Its quite sad to limit yourself in the way you claim to be limited and im afraid I cant help you.

just go back to the TV and beer mate, If half a page does not help you fathom out a pretty basic scenario, then there is no hope...
:-"

Post by **trubrit** » October 29, 2011, 2:08 pm

Up to now I have not taken sides in this battle but it is pretty obvious the OP doesn't take criticism lightly and is running on a very short fuse. So without even hearing the wife's side I am inclined to feel rather sorry for her .As I have said before. Don't post your domestic disputes on a public forum as you are inviting everyone reading to comment, some of which you might not like. :-"

Post by **BenZona** » October 29, 2011, 3:10 pm

trubrit wrote:Up to now I have not taken sides in this battle but it is pretty obvious the OP doesn't take criticism lightly and is running on a very short fuse. So without even hearing the wife's side I am inclined to feel rather sorry for her .As I have said before. Don't post your domestic disputes on a public forum as you are inviting everyone reading to comment, some of which you might not like. :-"

There is a big difference between criticism (ronan stan and a few more) and downright stupidity and pointless winding up (the other 4 or 5.. well what an i call them? "benzona?s" ;-0)

Fret ye not Truebrit, i can handle both pretty well but as for TOLERATING..well does anyone tolerate stupidity much? You are welcome to your views truebrit, it matters not who you feel sorry for, but please feel free to comment liberally on how the visa scamming

is poorly done by because i post on here... a bit of a link jump but if you can manage it.........im all ears

Post by **trubrit** » October 29, 2011, 4:44 pm

BenZona wrote:t
There is a big difference between criticism (ronan stan and a few more) and downright stupidity and pointless winding up (the other 4 or 5.. well what an i call them? "benzona?s" ;-0)

Precisely my point., Do you not think your constant derogatory comments on posters age is downright, not only stupid but totally unnecessary, after all I would guess you to be about 30 years younger than me. Do you really claim to be more intelligent ?

I think you are proving that stupidity has absolutely no connection with age .