I'm no booster of the new airport but everything must be taken in context.. one of the stories in the string lauded KL, HK, and Singapore's airports.. The reviews for HK and KLwere not all that good when they first opened.. Of course, only time will show if Suvarnaphumi will improve as both KL and HK have done.
see the links:
1999 KL's new airport opens to stinging criticism.. It took six months to get everything straightened out:
http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/frheft/ ... R9902f.htm
Hong Kong's new airports 1998 opening:
(the article below is from the HK government website!!)
The airport opening was initially marred by technical and teething problems in the passenger terminal, which affected baggage handling, flight information displays, lifts and escalators and even the public toilets. These were largely rectified within a fortnight of opening.
Air cargo handling was more seriously affected by problems with the automated handling system at the new 'Super Terminal 1' operated by Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Ltd (HACTL). This forced HACTL to re-open its air cargo facility at Kai Tak until the new terminal at Chek Lap Kok - one of the world's biggest - was running smoothly. By August 24, all incoming and outgoing air cargo was being handled at HACTL's new Super Terminal 1.
http://www.info.gov.hk/info/sar2/infrast.htm
Singapore's Changi, fully opened in 1981 five month after it's first official airline arrival. Perhaps this ramp up from a few flights to full service assisted in making the Changi operation an international model. Perhaps the forced speedup of Suvarnaphumi's opening contributed to some of the problems seen today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_Changi_Airport