America coming apart at the seams?

[Kenr6583]

the Animals who destroyed the Capitol

Didn't start any fires. Didn't loot. Didn't carry weapons. Didn't destroy citizen's livlihoods. Didn't destroy neighborhoods.

[Redacted by Moderators]

Tell the family of the Capitol police officer who was killed that no citizens livelihood was destroyed, or the other four people who died as a result. No looting? Right. No weapons? Laughable. I know you're nothing but a troll, but you should at least be somewhat truthful and not be so obviously ignorant. And don't rephrase/edit my comment, I never called them animals, that's pretty weak, but typical BS from you.

[Giggle]

Even the shill news org CNN is struggling.

To date, little information has been shared publicly about the circumstances of the death of the 13-year veteran of the police force, including any findings from an autopsy that was conducted by DC's medical examiner. (I wonder why!?)

In a statement the day after the insurrection, Capitol Police said that Sicknick had been "injured while physically engaging with protesters" and collapsed as a result of his injuries sometime after returning to his office. He died the next day in a local hospital.

Still working on concocting the details. CNN will let us know when they've finished.

Another fabricated news effort aimed at creating a story that doesn't exist -- ala Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Floyd et al. Fake bulsh!t garbage vacuumed up continuously by those to dimwitted to see it.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/02/poli ... index.html

[Giggle]

I didn't rephrase your comment, Einstein. You can't possibly be as stupid as you appear on this forum.

[Udon Map]

Even the shill news org CNN is struggling.

To date, little information has been shared publicly about the circumstances of the death of the 13-year veteran of the police force, including any findings from an autopsy that was conducted by DC's medical examiner. (I wonder why!?)

In a statement the day after the insurrection, Capitol Police said that Sicknick had been "injured while physically engaging with protesters" and collapsed as a result of his injuries sometime after returning to his office. He died the next day in a local hospital.

Still working on concocting the details. CNN will let us know when they've finished.

Another fabricated news effort aimed at creating a story that doesn't exist -- ala Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Floyd et al. Fake garbage vacuumed up continuously by those to dimwitted to see it.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/02/poli ... index.html

Interesting that you, and you alone, seem to know the facts about what happened, that the officer didn't die from injuries sustained in the riot. I'm sure that the FBI would be grateful if you would share your insights with it.

[Kenr6583]

I didn't rephrase your comment, Einstein. You can't possibly be as stupid as you appear on this forum.

Definitely not a stupid as you, that's a given. You claim I wrote something that didn't, but given the fact that all you know is how to distort and fabricate, it's not surprising.

I guess being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher had nothing to do with his death.

What an idiot....

[Laan Yaa Mo]

Democrat cities are awash in homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism and bigotry.

Interesting phenomenon that no Republican-controlled cities have any problems with homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism or bigotry. I guess that one can find an idyllic Shangri La simply by changing one's residence. I'll start looking today!

It is strange that whenever the issue of what progressive/democratic mayors are doing on socio-economic issues many posters prefer to divert the issue to avoid answering the question. You (Udon Map), tamada, KenR and, Whistler are examples of posters who do this. It is true that the socio-economic file is a difficult one to solve, but are the progressives doing anything? Why not enlist the enthusiasm and ability of Black Lives Matter, for example, to get into those areas and try to end the poverty, black-on-black violence and other problems in the inner cities? What happens to the money that is allotted to deal with socio-economic issues? Try to stay on topic if you answer.

[Kenr6583]

Democrat cities are awash in homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism and bigotry.

Interesting phenomenon that no Republican-controlled cities have any problems with homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism or bigotry. I guess that one can find an idyllic Shangri La simply by changing one's residence. I'll start looking today!

It is strange that whenever the issue of what progressive/democratic mayors are doing on socio-economic issues many posters prefer to divert the issue to avoid answering the question. You (Udon Map), tamada, KenR and, Whistler are examples of posters who do this. It is true that the socio-economic file is a difficult one to solve, but are the progressives doing anything? Why not enlist the enthusiasm and ability of Black Lives Matter, for example, to get into those areas and try to end the poverty, black-on-black violence and other problems in the inner cities? What happens to the money that is allotted to deal with socio-economic issues? Try to stay on topic if you answer.

Why do you bring me into this when I didn't respond to that post? In fact that's the first post that I remember reading on the subject, so how could I have ever changed the subject?

So please LYM, go back and find a post on here where I changed the subject on this issue and share it.

Not like your buddy Giggle, who goes back and edits what somebody writes and passes it off as if that is what the person wrote.

[Udon Map]

Democrat cities are awash in homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism and bigotry.

Interesting phenomenon that no Republican-controlled cities have any problems with homelessness, drugs, crime, corruption, racism or bigotry. I guess that one can find an idyllic Shangri La simply by changing one's residence. I'll start looking today!

It is strange that whenever the issue of what progressive/democratic mayors are doing on socio-economic issues many posters prefer to divert the issue to avoid answering the question. You (Udon Map), tamada, KenR and, Whistler are examples of posters who do this. It is true that the socio-economic file is a difficult one to solve, but are the progressives doing anything? Why not enlist the enthusiasm and ability of Black Lives Matter, for example, to get into those areas and try to end the poverty, black-on-black violence and other problems in the inner cities? What happens to the money that is allotted to deal with socio-economic issues? Try to stay on topic if you answer.

I view BLM as basically a terrorist organization.

I'm not changing the subject. Many, Giggle included, talk as if the problems facing large urban areas are solely the fault of the Dems and exist only in cities with Dem administrations. That's just not the case.

[Laan Yaa Mo]

I sort of agree with you about BLM although they do not act that way in Canada. Their big rallying cry here is to defund the police, and to prohibit police from entering so-called racialised, black, indigenous and people of colour neighbourhoods (their words, not mine).

So what are the progressive/democratic mayors doing to improve socio-economic conditions in the areas they administer?

[Giggle]

They now support segregation. That's been called racial discrimination since 1964. Now it's defended by leftist lunatics as diversity and kumbaya nonsense. These people are truly deplorable.

[tamada]

I sort of agree with you about BLM although they do not act that way in Canada. Their big rallying cry here is to defund the police, and to prohibit police from entering so-called racialised, black, indigenous and people of colour neighbourhoods (their words, not mine).

So what are the progressive/democratic mayors doing to improve socio-economic conditions in the areas they administer?

Is your Google search engine broken?

[glalt]

I refuse to get into any pissing contest but will say that the cities being torn apart by anarchists are indeed democrat controlled and have been for many years. Can you deny that?

[Whistler]

I refuse to get into any pissing contest but will say that the cities being torn apart by anarchists are indeed democrat controlled and have been for many years. Can you deny that?

A gross exaggeration.

Here is a challenge for you, compare the crime rate in large Republican controlled cities with the crime rate of Democratic controlled cities. Now name 10 Republican cities of over 1M people that has no problems with crime ghettos etc? I will give you a leg up, there are none, not one single American city with a large population is Republican.

Large cities have large problems, not Democratic governed cities are worse than Republican governed cities.

Here is another clue for you. One of the largest Republican cities in the USA is Ft Worth, listed as the second most dangerous city in the USA based on major crimes.

[Giggle]

We can't address the real problem on this or any other forum. So a proxy will have to do. Yes, we all know the problem.

Interestingly, the left has embraced this problem and adopted it as a pet project to signal virtue and compassion when it's really just used as a tool every few election years, and then a doormat other times. Truly deplorable.

[glalt]

https://america-wake-up.com/2019/09/30/ ... -60-years/

[Whistler]

https://america-wake-up.com/2019/09/30/ ... -60-years/

You clearly ignored what I wrote as it did not fit your point of view., not surprised. A far right web site is much more appealing to your viewpoint than simple facts

[jackspratt]

I didn't rephrase your comment, Einstein. You can't possibly be as stupid as you appear on this forum.

No, you just misquoted it - those are my words, not Kenr's.

Perhaps I have scared you into blocking me giggley - but for whatever reason, the real stupidity has been exposed for all to see.

Not that further exposure was required.

[Laan Yaa Mo]

I refuse to get into any pissing contest but will say that the cities being torn apart by anarchists are indeed democrat controlled and have been for many years. Can you deny that?

A gross exaggeration.

Here is a challenge for you, compare the crime rate in large Republican controlled cities with the crime rate of Democratic controlled cities. Now name 10 Republican cities of over 1M people that has no problems with crime ghettos etc? I will give you a leg up, there are none, not one single American city with a large population is Republican.

Large cities have large problems, not Democratic governed cities are worse than Republican governed cities.

Here is another clue for you. One of the largest Republican cities in the USA is Ft Worth, listed as the second most dangerous city in the USA based on major crimes.

You ignored Galt's question, and deflected to your own agenda. Why? This is not to say your deflection isn't valid, but you should start a new thread about Fort Worth if that is what you wish to discuss

[Laan Yaa Mo]

I sort of agree with you about BLM although they do not act that way in Canada. Their big rallying cry here is to defund the police, and to prohibit police from entering so-called racialised, black, indigenous and people of colour neighbourhoods (their words, not mine).

So what are the progressive/democratic mayors doing to improve socio-economic conditions in the areas they administer?

Is your Google search engine broken?

I don't know, I haven't checked recently. Nice deflection.

[Udon Map]

We can't address the real problem on this or any other forum. So a proxy will have to do.

Not true. You can discuss this problem freely here. The post about which you complained was edited to remove a racial epithet. As you can see, there are plenty of posts here which express views opposite to mine. But you appear to have a particular narrative that you are trying to advance and do not appear to be interested in opinions different from yours, let alone actual facts.