Barney wrote: ↑August 31, 2022, 10:26 pm
The narrative is swinging 180 degree against the powers to be that perhaps had us suffer more than required.
https://youtu.be/9pR_qkeHJaw
Russell Brand is hardly an impartial observer.
Part of the problem is that using hindsight gives a very very different view than looking at an evolving unique situation and reacting to it.
Analysis of the results gives guidance to the future.
The excess deaths are a result of the actions in the past.
The deaths caused by COVID were not predictable so actions were required.
You have an unknown decease with unknown consequences. If you have a susceptible population, without doubt the vast majority were, then you have to take the view that the results could be similar to bubonic plague, you cannot assume that it’s similar to the common cold.
Get it wrong, act in the wrong way by not taking sufficient action and the death toll in the U.K. could have been 20 million.
Were mistakes made? Without a doubt. Mistakes are always made.
Were the mistakes deliberate? Absolutely not.
Was there complete agreement on actions, that were disregarded? Absolutely not.
EDIT TO ADD
Were the lockdowns in the U.K. late? Yes they were.
Were the travel restrictions late? Yes they were.
If the U.K. had locked down and restricted travel would there have been a better outcome? Almost certainly.
If I were in the U.K. in 2020 with no current knowledge I would’ve, like others did, have being pushing for more and faster action.
Did pharmaceutical companies make huge profits? Of course they did, that’s what they do, governments can tax them.
Did pharmaceutical companies make Vaccines at an incredibly fast pace? Yes they did.
Did pharmaceutical companies test as throughly as they are usually compelled to do? Of course not, it’s impossible to be as fast as they were and as through as they are usually required to be. It is impossible to condense a 10 year program to 18 months and be as complete, corners and big chunks have to be cut