marriage withhold freedom ,true or false?

Post by **lynxlynx** » December 27, 2007, 9:51 am

Aardvark wrote:Cant figure how your team won Bangsean_girl

Good point Aardvark.

I think that while the freedome issue can be disputed left or right, the unquestionable fact is that marriage brings along the burden of responsibility. And that's in my opinion a much harder issue to tackle than some loss of freedome.

Post by **aznyron** » December 27, 2007, 10:52 am

I just want to ad very few men go in to a marriage with nothing and walk away with more than they put in to the marraige and yes i seen many women go into a marriage with nothing but the clothes in there closet and leave with the house the car and 50% of the bank account
there some thing wrong with that picture when all she did was spread her legs
when she wanted it

Post by **Bangsean_girl** » December 27, 2007, 11:04 am

Aardvark wrote:Cant figure how your team won Bangsean_girl, just went back through the posts and most people agreed that marriage did not necessarilly diminish ones freedom. I think your side lost

well I did not know why the committee decided to let us won, but I would not bother to ask since my team won you know hehe. I think because the other teams they did not prepare well.The other team have more info to fight than my team actually! Even they have so many rationals to support their topic, they could not think of good ones. Most of the topics they prepared to speak, my team could fight back with the reasonable points:D well maybe it just one of our lucky day

However there is one quote the other team said "sex of married life is full of love, but sex of single life is full of desire" and we replied back that "sex of single life is full of passion, devotion,excitement; sex of married life is full of boredom:P ahoh well I 'm not saying it always right but it just something to fight them back u know

Anyway I wanna marriage someday so I'd not talk bout the advatages of being single anymore! End of story!!

Post by **Bangsean_girl** » December 27, 2007, 11:14 am

lynxlynx wrote:
Bangsean_girl wrote:Anyway somebody has asked my age and well I'd say that I'm not too young and not too old
... Coward

well Lynx I think age is just the number, and my lucky number right now is 21 ka.

Post by **lynxlynx** » December 27, 2007, 11:20 am

Bangsean_girl wrote:
lynxlynx wrote:
Bangsean_girl wrote:Anyway somebody has asked my age and well I'd say that I'm not too young and not too old
... Coward
well Lynx I think age is just the number, and my lucky number right now is 21 ka.

Bangsean_girl, what does "ka" stand for? You say "right now" - does it mean it changes? If so, why and what does it depend on?

Post by **jackspratt** » December 27, 2007, 11:23 am

aznyron wrote:I just want to ad very few men go in to a marriage with nothing and walk away with more than they put in to the marraige and yes i seen many women go into a marriage with nothing but the clothes in there closet and leave with the house the car and 50% of the bank account
there some thing wrong with that picture when all she did was spread her legs
when she wanted it

Very cynical Ron.

In my case, and I would suggest in many others who married young, also completely wrong.

When my wife an I married we had approximately the same assets - which was very little. We bought a house (at her insistence), had 3 kids, and separated after 22 years.

The house was sold for 16 times what we had paid for it. She got about 53%, and I got about 47%. She had the 2 older kids still at home, and the youngest came with me. The settlement was by mutual agreement, and we have stayed good friends ever since.

My share of the house sale (since re-invested) has allowed me to be comfortably off ever since, and retire in LOS at 57.

My (ex-) wife's contribution was certainly a great deal more than "spreading her legs".

What an offensive thing to say.

Post by **Aardvark** » December 27, 2007, 11:52 am

Bangsean_girl, at 21 you'd be crazy to consider marriage now so good luck with playing the field. I'm sure you will learn a lot and hopefully when you do settle down you will bring a lot of possitives into your relationship. Dont consider marriage a loss of freedom but rather a joining of forces in a world where money is rated higher than loyalty.

Post by **aznyron** » December 27, 2007, 11:57 am

Jack to you it might be offensive well that to bad. I also have a xwife who was good & honest in our marriage
I had a second wife who was not worth a ounce of salt and further more I did not say any thing about any body xwife except I made a general statement which does apply to many women
and get of my azz about what is offensive just look at some of the thai girls the way they rip off the unsuspecting farlong and if you read my words I said SOME not all and I will not be politically correct in this forum or any were else

Post by **Bangsean_girl** » December 27, 2007, 12:00 pm

Aardvark wrote:Bangsean_girl, at 21 you'd be crazy to consider marriage now so good luck with playing the field. I'm sure you will learn a lot and hopefully when you do settle down you will bring a lot of possitives into your relationship. Dont consider marriage a loss of freedom but rather a joining of forces in a world where money is rated higher than loyalty.

thank you for your advice Aardvark, well I's not like I'm getting married soon, but everyone's life should past this married time and sometime I'm wonder about it, that is all

laphanphon · Post by **laphanphon** » December 27, 2007, 12:02 pm

burden of responsibility

Ok, I

Post by **Bangsean_girl** » December 27, 2007, 12:04 pm

Aardvark wrote:Bangsean_girl, at 21 you'd be crazy to consider marriage now so good luck with playing the field. I'm sure you will learn a lot and hopefully when you do settle down you will bring a lot of possitives into your relationship. Dont consider marriage a loss of freedom but rather a joining of forces in a world where money is rated higher than loyalty.

thank you for your advice Aardvark, well I's not like I'm getting married soon, but everyone's life should past this married time and sometime I'm doubted about it u know, that is all

Post by **jackspratt** » December 27, 2007, 12:24 pm

I suggest you have another look at your post Ron.

"Many" to me suggests you are talking about a large number of ex-wives. A lot different to "some".

And if you choose to be offensive, I will stay on your "azz" to make you accountable. It has nothing to do will political correctness, but more to do with decency and respect.

Post by **aznyron** » December 27, 2007, 1:00 pm

excuse me for not being very careful on how i choose my words
so now we are getting into english grammer many & some is not a big difference
as decency & respect you show me were I failed in that area
I just think you want to be a pain in the azz Jack if so find some one else to haunt

Post by **lynxlynx** » December 27, 2007, 1:02 pm

laphanphon wrote:[
what does "ka" stand for?
, oops, sorry again, have you ever been to thailand? sorry, couldn't help it again.

Well, sorry Laphanphon I asked. "21 ka" could have meant something different than "kha" - female ending of a sentence - if that's what you are referring to.

Post by **lynxlynx** » December 27, 2007, 1:09 pm

laphanphon wrote:
burden of responsibility

Ok, I

laphanphon · Post by **laphanphon** » December 27, 2007, 4:47 pm

no more nibbles, enjoy your fishing trips, tried to understand you, as 'burden of responsibility' is a bit vague. how you misconstrue what i was saying, attempting to turn it into a debate on a vague expression. i thought what i wrote was self explanitory.

notice the tide is against you and those lines are starting to snap.

i'm going back scuba diving, but will leave those tiny troll lines alone in the future. if going diving with the big boys, you need much better bate. that's why i always dive with people bigger and slower than me.

going to play with the big boys, need bigger bait.